GRAINES Summer School, St Andrews, 7-10 June 2015

Tag: Habsburg

Cultural Communication in the Habsburg Monarchy. The Case of Galicia-Silesia/Silesia-Galicia (1848-1914)

I am a PhD student and researcher at the University of Vienna (Doctoral program: Austrian Galicia and its Multicultural Heritage). My PhD project titled “Cultural Communication in the Habsburg Monarchy. The Case of Galicia-Silesia/Silesia-Galicia (1848-1914)” focuses on connections between Austrian Galicia and Austrian Silesia, specifically on associations (cultural and educational, mostly national orientated), migration (in the context of industrialization), family history (e.g. of national activists and their connections) and inter-regional communication in the muti-ethnic Galician–Austrian-Silesian border land from a trans-and intercultural perspective, with particular reference to the establishment of national movements and their impact on “everyday (cultural) hybridity” .

My main fields of interest are: inter-/trans-cultural communication, border regions and trans-border/interregional networks, cultural hybridity, migration, minorities, transnational history of Central Europe.

The text below is an example depiction of historical and socio-cultural phenomena, closely connected with transfer, networking and communication, that I am working on, in my project frame.

No Network – No Nation? A hybrid actor, a monolithic idea and inter-ethnic dynamics in the Galician – Austrian-Silesian border region

The Galician-Silesian border land was a multilingual (German, Polish, Czech, Silesian) and multi-religious (Catholic, Protestant, Jewish) transit region between two crown lands of the Habsburg Empire: the Austrian Galicia and Austrian Silesia. This border region made up a frame for a multiethnic, hybrid community on one hand and national movements (German, Polish, Czech, Silesian) on the other hand, from which the Polish movement draws special interest in this context. The emergence and highly complex mechanism of the Polish national network in the Silesian-Galician borderland can serve as a prime example of establishing a network through the interconnecting of actors (national activists), of ideas (primarily the idea of a nation) and of objects (e.g. newspapers).

Thanks to multiple strategies and a lot of effort Pawel Stalmach (1824 -1891) created the Polish national network between Silesia and Galicia from the very beginning, within the local multiethnic community. Stalmach was born in Austrian Silesia, went to a Czech primary school, then to a German secondary school, studied protestant theology in Bratislava where he decided to become Polish activist thanks to his Slovak friends. Shortly before his death, he converted to Catholicism to make the relationship to the catholic Galician Poles easier, bringing first Polish books to Silesia and establishing the first relationship with Polish people. As the first initiator and main actor of the Silesian-Galician Polish national relations, he created a fundamental network by organizing of associations, newspapers, festivals, schools etc., that played a crucial role in the establishment of Polish national movement in Silesia – he recognized that this approach was the only way to convince at least part of the hybrid local community to give up their multiethnic origins in favour of a monolithic national identity.

 

Homi K. Bhabha: The Location of Culture. London-New York 1994.

Chris Hann; Paul Robert Magocsi (ed.): Galicia. A Multicultured Land. Toronto 2005.

Pieter Judson: Guardians of the Nation: Activists on the Language Frontiers of Imperial Austria. Cambridge 2006.

Tomasz Kamusella: Silesia and Central European Nationalisms: The Emergence of National and Ethnic Groups in Prussian Silesia and Austrian Silesia 1848-1914. West Lafayette 2007.

Wolfgang Welsch: Transculturality: The Puzzling Form of Cultures Today. In: California Sociologist, 17&18 (1994/1995), pp.19-39.

Travelling networks by Martin Schaller

Who I am

Hello and welcome to my first blogpost. My name is Martin Schaller. I am a PhD-candidate in Modern History at the University of St Andrews but currently living in Vienna.

In 2009, I commenced my studies in history and economics at the University of Vienna. After obtaining Bachelor degrees in both subjects I relocated to St Andrews in 2012 where I graduated with a MLitt in Modern History. The focus of my research is the outside perspective on the Habsburg Empire. I am examining British and German travel accounts to better understand how this huge entity in the middle of Europe was perceived and located during the 19th century – after all it was situated on the crossroads between East and West Europe. This is only a rough outline of my PhD-project but I am more than happy to discuss details during the Summer School.

A longer research period in Vienna allowed to concurrently work in the R&D-Department of the Austrian National Library, coordinating the Europeana Newspapers Project, a project that focused on newspaper digitization and its refinement by applying Optical Character Recognition. My involvement within the Austrian National Library facilitated a deeper understanding of the foundations necessary to allow Digital Humanities to work with historic material.

The research I am doing

For the Summer School I am preparing a small scale project that is aimed at clarifying some issues in my general research. Hence, what I am doing here should at some point feed into my PhD-project.

Traveller’s networks – textual networks

The notion of ‘networks’ often evokes the idea of researching the relationships between people but this is certainly only one form of networks. Equally important, though not that often in the centre of interest are connections between people and goods, the interconnection of different goods but also between objects in general.

To limit the topic to a manageable size I concentrate on British travel writers on the Habsburg Empire in the 1820s and 1830s. The genre of travel literature on continental Europe was thriving at the time. Influenced by late Enlightenment ideas of knowledge accumulation and progress, the genre kept the agenda of collecting and distributing knowledge into the 19th century.[1] Besides technological and economic development the political situation of the researched time period aided the boom. As a scholar remarked: “…years of Napoleonic war had whetted the public appetite for information and sketches of places so recently famous…”[2] In short, a lot of British travellers were on the continent, visiting also places not necessary found on traditional itineraries.

In the course of my research for the Summer School I realized that there are actually two types of networks relevant to understand travel and travel writing of the time: a more abstract type of intellectual network and a more tangible personal network. In the following lines I would like to describe both kinds of networks briefly.

Networks based on writings?

As any publication, travel literature was not only published but of course also discussed. Reviews, sometimes even reviews of reviews, appeared in newspapers and magazines across Great Britain commenting on each published travel account and thus fostering a discourse on the Habsburg Empire. But this process was certainly not unidirectional. German speaking audiences were highly aware of the ongoing discussions and had, despite official censorship, access to them. Thus by examining biographies, primary works and their reviews we are able to trace a highly interesting net of responses and counterstatements across borders. This net allows for valuable insights into transnational links that formed certain ideas about a foreign entity.

A more tangible network is the result of the social practice of travel. 19th century travellers faced a problem also known to modern day travellers who voluntarily relinquish modern tourism infrastructure: How to get in touch with locals? The answer of the time was the letter of recommendation. A contemporary traveller furnished with appropriate letters was able to unlock doors and enter circles otherwise closed. This was also an important possibility to acquire new information that would later help to sell the book or render it controversial and thus have a direct impact on the narrative these travel writers were producing eventually.

What I can offer

I see myself as a person who knows both the ‘user’ and the ‘producer’ side in Digital Humanities. I can give insights in technologies that are used in creating the digital content from historical documents (first and foremost OCR) that allow for visualisation and further analysis by researchers. However, my main motivation is to meet and discuss with researchers and students applying a transnational view on History.

Bibliography:

As outlined above, my research is much more focused on transnational history than on the study of networks. Therefore my selected works have a bias towards the former. However, I am convinced that these articles and books are also relevant to understand networks across borders.

Scales do matter; I my opinion also for the study of networks. Therefore I’d like to suggest the following, more theory driven article, which examines the relationship between scales and transnational history: Bernhard Struck, Kate Ferris and Jacques Revel, Introduction: Space and Scale in Transnational History, in The International History Review, 33:4, pp. 573-584.

A good overview of traveling and travel writing as a research topic as well as the social practice (and hence networks) of travel gives: Hagen Schulz-Forberg, European Travel and Travel Writing: Cultural Practice and the Idea of Europe in: Hagen Schulz-Forberg (ed.), Unravelling Civilisation: European Travel and Travel Writing (Brussels 2005), pp. 13-42.

On transnational history and my own research, I see two works as really important: Larry Wolff, Inventing Eastern Europe: The map of civilization on the mind of the Enlightenment (Stanford 1995) and Maria Todorova, Imagining the Balkans (New York, Oxford 1997).

 

[1] Casey Blanton, Travel writing: The Self and the World (New York 2002), pp. 3-4, 15.

[2] Helen Heineman, Mrs. Trollope: The Triumphant Feminine in the Nineteenth Century (Athens 1979), p. 121.