{"id":962,"date":"2021-10-24T16:27:48","date_gmt":"2021-10-24T16:27:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/transnationalhistory.net\/world\/?p=962"},"modified":"2021-10-24T16:27:48","modified_gmt":"2021-10-24T16:27:48","slug":"korean-buddhism-understanding-the-key-factors-of-its-survival","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/transnationalhistory.net\/world\/2021\/10\/korean-buddhism-understanding-the-key-factors-of-its-survival\/","title":{"rendered":"Korean Buddhism: Understanding the Key Factors of its Survival."},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\u2018Korean Buddhism was already considered \u2018half dead, half alive’, representing \u2018nothing more than other-worldly hermits in the mountains.\u2019[1]<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

There are multiple factors to consider regarding Buddhism within Chos\u014fn Korea and its fight for modernisation. Darwinism, socialism, the Tonghak uprisings and Japan all influenced Buddhism to reconsider its mechanisms in order to survive this new social demand. However, depending on the historian these factors differ in value. Jin Park[2]<\/a> and Vladimir Tikhonov[3]<\/a> both focus on one important historical figure which enabled Buddhism to modernise in a way that would ensure its survival. Han Yongun had a variety of education which differed in forms which was essential to understanding what exactly a modern Korea should look like, and how Buddhism might be able to keep its place within the country\u2019s future.<\/p>\n

Jin Park does not give much context regarding why Han Yongun was influential within the modernising of Buddhism other than his open-minded ideas regarding the freedom to marry for monks and nuns, however this does give insight to the influence in which Japan had on Korean Buddhism. In the areas which Jin Park has been unable to highlight Han Yongun\u2019s importance, Tikhonov has been able assess the different factors which enabled Han Yongun to understand how society was beginning to function under Darwin\u2019s concept of \u2018survival of the fittest\u2019. With his collaborated text of \u2018Selected Writings on Han Yongun: From social Darwinism to Socialism with a Buddhist Face<\/em>\u2019[4]<\/a>, Tikhonov is able to highlight other factors such as the Tonghak uprisings and the aftermath of the Russo-Japanese war, which Han Yongun was able to witness, enabling him to better understand what survival meant for Korea and how the modernising world around Korea may influence it.<\/p>\n

Another factor that Tikhonov highlights is the influence of Laing Qichao upon Han Yongun, which is mentioned within both of his texts. Through this Han Yongun was able to obtain a better understanding of Social Darwinism and how it can be used to ensure the survival of Buddhism. \u2018The main lesson the Korean nationalists were keen to learn from Liang was the Social Darwinist understanding of evolution as a competitive dog-eat-dog \u2018struggle for survival, where the downfall of the \u2018weaker devoured by the stronger\u2019 was blamed only on the victims\u2019 \u2018failure to strengthen themselves\u2019.[5]<\/strong><\/a> <\/em>Although Buddhism was and is strictly non-nationalist, there were monks like Han Yongun, who were able to disassociate it with Social Darwinism and take the relevant information from it to create the necessary means for strengthening Buddhism\u2019s place within a modernising Korea. This is perhaps why there is such an emphasis on Han Yongun within Tikhonovs texts because through this Buddhist figure there is a variety of factors which all connect to the modernisation of Korea. Han Yongun was educated on nationalism through his experience of the Tonghak uprising and his travels to Russia, however, he was also educated through Confucian and Buddhist teachings. Therefore, he was able to use this knowledge to understand which areas of Buddhism could be changed to adapt better to Korean society which would attract a bigger following and ensure its capability to compete against other religions.<\/p>\n

Tikhonov highlights why Buddhism would perhaps struggle to finds its place within the religious competition, especially within Korea. These were factors such as the lack of European language skills which the majority of the Korean Buddhist shared, the isolation which the monks and nuns experienced as a result of Confucianism being more favoured, which therefore lead to Buddhism lacking any form of solid ground within Korea. The result of this meant that toward the late nineteenth century Buddhism within Korea was beginning to experience a decline in followers. However, Yong-u Han, Vladimir Tikhonov and Owen Miller focus their argument on supporting Buddhism and why it could be deemed more suitable to creating progress within the modern world in comparison to\u00a0 Christianity and Confucianism. The main strength of their argument comes from using figures such as Han Yongun and Laing Qichao to highlight that those who followed the belief were capable of comprehending the modernisation of Buddhism and the route it must take to establish that. By focusing on the inner workings of Buddhism and the influence of Laing and Yongun the argument focuses on the qualities of Buddhism which places it above Confucianism and Christianity. These qualities are the ability to reject self-righteousness and ignorance, which would therefore, ensure progression for those who followed the belief because they would not be swept up by a world based on capital and survival.<\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> Vladimir M. Tikhonov, Social Darwinism and Nationalism in Korea: The Beginnings (1800s-1920s): \u201cSurvival\u201d as an Ideology of Korean Modernity (Brill, 2010) p.117.<\/p>\n

[2]<\/a> Jin Y. Park, Makers of Modern Korean Buddhism (SUNY Press, 2010).<\/p>\n

[3]<\/a> Vladimir M. Tikhonov, Social Darwinism and Nationalism in Korea: The Beginnings (1800s-1920s): \u201cSurvival\u201d as an Ideology of Korean Modernity (Brill, 2010).<\/p>\n

[4]<\/a> Yong-un Han, Vladimir Tikhonov, Owen Miller, Selected Writings on Han Yongun: From social Darwinism to Socialism with a Buddhist Face (Global Oriental, 2008).<\/p>\n

[5]<\/a> Yong-un Han, Vladimir Tikhonov , Owen Miller, Selected Writings on Han Yongun: From social Darwinism to Socialism with a Buddhist Face (Global Oriental, 2008) p.5.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u2018Korean Buddhism was already considered \u2018half dead, half alive’, representing \u2018nothing more than other-worldly hermits in the mountains.\u2019[1] There are multiple factors to consider regarding Buddhism within Chos\u014fn Korea and its fight for modernisation. Darwinism, socialism, the Tonghak uprisings and Japan all influenced Buddhism to reconsider its mechanisms in order to survive this new social … Continue reading “Korean Buddhism: Understanding the Key Factors of its Survival.”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[11,115,130],"class_list":["post-962","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-buddhism","tag-choson-korea","tag-korea"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/transnationalhistory.net\/world\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/962","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/transnationalhistory.net\/world\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/transnationalhistory.net\/world\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/transnationalhistory.net\/world\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/transnationalhistory.net\/world\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=962"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/transnationalhistory.net\/world\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/962\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1036,"href":"https:\/\/transnationalhistory.net\/world\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/962\/revisions\/1036"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/transnationalhistory.net\/world\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=962"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/transnationalhistory.net\/world\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=962"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/transnationalhistory.net\/world\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=962"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}